Home › Aggregators › Fuq data review
26-week composite history
Metric breakdown
“Trust” measures transparency and accountability signals — published policies, DMCA/contact pages, domain history. It is not a guarantee of safety; use your own judgment and protection.
Features & pricing
- Free access
- Most viewing on Fuq is free — about 85% of the catalog.
- Signup
- No account is needed for basic viewing.
- Mobile
- The mobile experience scores 64/100 in our tests.
Content categories
Tracked in
Category performance
What the numbers mean
Fuq's current tracked index sits at 62.7, up from 61.4 the prior period — a modest gain that keeps it comfortably within its recent range. Over the last 26 weeks it has moved between a low of 60.9 and a high of 65.1, so this is a stable performer, not a volatile one. The uptick suggests small improvement rather than a step change.
The category-level Verdict Index of 62.9 places Fuq at #15 of 36 in Aggregators. Its strongest sub-metric by a wide margin is index depth at 79/100, which is the primary reason it clears the middle of the pack. Popularity, scored separately at 90/100, reinforces that this is a heavily-used platform.
The counterweight is trust and safety at 44/100 and ad quietness at 50/100. Navigation (62/100) and activity (60/100) are middling. In short: the score is a story of breadth and traffic pulling up against transparency and ad load pulling down.
Free access (~85%) and zero signup friction don't move the category index directly but explain why the site's real-world usability outperforms its trust reading.
Confidence & data notes
Measured, higher-confidence metrics here include mobile (95), ad level (95), popularity (85), trust (85) and library depth (85) — the ad level and mobile figures come from direct observation, and library and popularity are derived. These are the numbers we'd lean on hardest.
Quality scores 45, player scores 45, freshness scores 45, founding scores 45, free share scores 60, signup scores 60, and the format flags score 60.
Important: the trust score of 44 measures transparency and accountability signals — published policies, contact and DMCA infrastructure, domain history — not user safety. A low figure means less documentation, not a hazard rating.
Does Fuq offer Lesbian and Ebony content?
Yes. Both Lesbian and Ebony sit inside Fuq’s category set, which also includes Amateur, Anal, MILF & mature, Asian, Latina, Interracial, POV, Threesome, Big tits and Blowjob. The large free share lets visitors open any of these sections without paying or registering first.
Do I need an account on Fuq?
No account is required to watch the free majority of Fuq. Roughly eighty-five percent of videos play straight away, accompanied only by moderate ads. That friction-free approach suits quick visits focused on niches like Interracial, POV or Blowjob without extra steps.
Is Fuq legit?
Fuq presents the transparency signals typical of tube directories—open free access, visible niche lists and no forced signup. Transparency aids evaluation yet never guarantees safety. Users remain responsible for their own browser protections and common-sense habits when using fuq.com.
Similar sites to Fuq
Bookmark.xxx, iWank, XXX Shame and FuckMoral are the direct alternatives named for Fuq. They serve the same broad free-tube audience. Sampling all four alongside the original helps you pick the interface that best surfaces Amateur, Asian, MILF & mature or other preferred tags.
FAQ
What does a Verdict Index of 62.9 mean?
It's a composite category score placing Fuq at #15 of 36 in Aggregators — an above-average middle finisher, strong on index depth and traffic, weak on transparency.
Is the score trending up or down?
Up slightly. The current tracked value is 62.7 versus 61.4 last period, within a 26-week band of 60.9 to 65.1.
Which numbers are most reliable?
Mobile, ad level, popularity, trust and library depth carry the highest confidence. Quality, player and freshness are lower-confidence estimates.
Does a low trust score mean the site is unsafe?
No. Trust here measures published transparency and accountability signals, not safety. A 44 means limited documentation, not a danger rating.
